Keep it Lean

17 November 2008 by Alexander Arcache




Rob Theunissen, Alexander Arcache and Peter Margetis of McKinsey discuss the merits of lean finance.


Decreased margins caused by greater customer price pressure and higher costs are forcing a new focus on overhead costs. At the same time, as service differentiation becomes more important, a better service level is required, pushing companies to find ways to collaborate more closely with their customers. Increasingly fluctuating and varying consumer demand means that not just the level of service, but also the speed of response is of utmost importance.

In addition to introducing product and service innovations, the support of a robust finance function is essential to successfully meet the challenges posed by this demanding market environment. The place of the finance function has come under much scrutiny from within companies and has evolved from its traditional supporting role to a more strategic one. This has led to an increased expectation from top management for the finance function to contribute to operational decision making.

Indeed, the finance function has the power to help organisations operate more efficiently to reduce cost. A well-oiled finance function can help companies expand their service offering and adapt better to customer needs. It can drive sales performance by bringing transparency of inventory availability, delivery schedules, credit terms and discounts to the sales force. Finance can contribute to companies’ financial strength by being cost-efficient and optimising working capital management by increasing collections and decreasing advanced payments.

Going lean

Key finance-driven processes – order-to-cash, procure-topay, monthly or quarterly closing, and forecasting – impact customers, sales, corporate efficiency and effectiveness. In our experience, lean techniques are unmatched in their power to help organisations meet all finance process objectives, increasing the quality of the customer experience and so improving the overall competitiveness of the company.

The lean vision aims for zero waste by fighting three common challenges: rigidity, waste and variability. The objective is for activities to be value-added and to produce the quality demanded by the customer in the shortest time.

The lean approach has, meanwhile, found its way across diverse industries such as banking, telecommunications and pharmaceuticals, to name a few. Lean processes have also penetrated almost every corporate division, from product development to manufacturing to marketing and sales. Companies applying lean turn their focus around from a product-centric to a customer-centric organisation and benefit from improvements in quality and efficiency of 40-70%.

Lean is now beginning to make its mark on the finance function too. By introducing a comprehensive lean programme across all finance processes, one leading global CPG company managed to reduce error rates in sales orders from 10% to just under 1%. Getting the full order correctly the first time reduced rework and optimised communication between customers, salespeople, and finance. Operational changes also resulted in decreased waiting times for monthly reports of 50% and increased sales productivity of more than 10%.

"Getting the full order correctly the first time reduced rework and optimised communication between customers, salespeople, and finance."

This kind of impact is not achieved overnight, however. In this company, the lean transformation team conducted a thorough and detailed analysis of the order-to-cash process and made long-term improvements, with special attention paid to error generation and order handling. They reduced reconciliation errors by introducing a simplified and improved document handling process. Clerical, inventory related, and promotional errors were also reduced to under 1%. Using checks and newly established KPIs managers were able to identify process issues immediately and directly at the source, before they had a chance to cascade down the line and resurface days, weeks or months later.

The positive effects of a comprehensive lean approach go beyond the customer order process. Such an approach can increase administrative efficiency and allow more time for procurement to focus on large-ticket purchases. Lean can streamline the entire procure-to-pay process, simplifying reconciliation, approval, and payment processes. Focus and simplification lead to an efficiency increase of 30-50% for routine purchases at a client.

By focusing on better communication and interaction between employees and increasing data collection before end-of-period, the speed of reporting, so critical for monthly or quarterly closing, can also be reduced by half, to three days rather than six. Such a change requires no significant automation. Reduced errors also have positive impact on business planning and forecasting. A more proactive structured planning process can ensure high-precision rates in business forecasting. It is these gains that ultimately lead to a true competitive advantage for companies introducing a comprehensive lean process.

Order-to-cash

Going lean is never an isolated approach by a single function like finance. The order-to-cash process, running from order entry to collections, touches a number of different departments – sales, finance, warehouse and logistics. Although the process must be seamless to the customer, the cross-functional intensity and numerous interfaces create the potential for a large number of improvements across all points in the process.

In order to identify process improvements, it is important to get down to the right level of detail. Creating a detailed process map, a tool often used in lean manufacturing, can help companies identify the key challenges and errors in the order-to-cash process.

Process maps help companies understand customers and process objectives. They increase transparency by highlighting the key interfaces and inventorying the material, information, tools and resources used in a process. The maps also quantify hours spent by full-time employees – and whether those hours were spent working productively or waiting idly.

Process maps provide a structured framework to help prioritise improvement activities. Often, employees are quick to point out areas of frustration as "must fix" improvement areas, yet these may only provide small benefits. Since a process map not only identifies but also quantifies the resources required for each process step, it can be easily used to prioritise key areas and identify areas requiring further analysis and investigation. For example, although one process for document filing had been clearly outlined for nearly a decade, in practice it was not being followed and 30% of documents were filed improperly. This created a tremendous administrative burden that included a focus on fire fighting rather than normal activities. This additional time was clearly highlighted on the process map. The "fix" was clear in that, just by enforcing existing process rules, the need for overtime and temporary personnel was drastically reduced.

"Defining a new process is rarely enough. It needs to be accompanied by the right KPIs to track performance towards the goal."

However, defining a new process is rarely enough. It needs to be accompanied by the right KPIs to track performance towards the goal and by mechanisms to immediately spot deviations from the target process. Such self-enforcing mechanisms can either be automated or manual checks. They should help maintain a robust and sustainable lean process and support the employees’ mental change towards a substantially lean mindset.

Procure-to-pay

One of the most prominent sources of improvement in another company was in the purchase order process. More than 50% of total time was spent negotiating on purchases worth €1,200 or less; those amounted to less than 3% of total revenues. The other 50% was spent on the remaining orders, which amounted to 97% of the volume.

The company then worked to eliminate unnecessary steps such as RFPs and competitive bidding for purchase orders amounting to less than €1,000. To maintain a long-term improvement perspective, the company ensured that a risk/ benefit assessment was conducted on a periodic basis.

Furthermore, many errors, delays and inefficiencies such as duplications were identified in the invoice receipt and payment process. Once these bottlenecks were marked and dealt with, one company was able to reduce the average time of invoice handling from 13 days to five, while decreasing error rates by 50% through vigorous training and performance management (see diagram, above). Continuous enforcement of policies and performance metrics were critical to long-term success.

As was the case for order-to-cash, much of the waste was found in manual processing, non-standardised processes for documents and errors in processing. With those errors reduced or eliminated, the CPG company enjoyed increased administrative efficiency as well as reduced invoice handling and payment processing costs.

Closing time

The monthly, quarterly, and annual closing process is always plagued by high error rates, considerable overtime, and extremely high levels of stress and frustration on the side of finance employees. By carefully using lean tools to identify a detailed step-by-step process, the closing process can be conducted in less time, while also being error and frustration free. The key success factors are an increase in preparation and coordination, while removing bottlenecks where possible.

In addition, it is important to develop a target process to guide the final closing process hour by hour. The advantage of the target closing process is that it clarifies process ownership and contributions across multiple stakeholders outside of finance. The tool also defines the scope of customer service, while focusing on interfaces and governance. In addition to increased preparation and coordination, one company also implemented automated checks and new Excel tools to help reduce errors. To maintain this level of performance on a continuous basis, they also monitored submission quality and deadlines by using an internal KPI scorecard.

"Lean techniques eliminate sources of hidden waste to reduce cost, maximise speed and improve service quality for a better customer experience."

The overall results were faster reporting, which led to faster decision making and more time for management to react. Unnecessary reporting was reduced by 30% and clients received their monthly reports in three days instead of six. More importantly, more time was dedicated to business planning and forecasting, making the overall business more focused and competitive.

With the support of a strong lean finance function, consumer packaged goods companies can better cope with the myriad of challenges – reliability, mounting margin pressures, speed of execution. A lean programme will always start by asking how the company can create more value to the customer. All measures developed in the programme should lead to a clear and measurable impact to the business. Therefore lean is not about making incremental process optimisation, but rather high impact, continuous improvements.

Lean techniques eliminate sources of hidden waste to reduce cost, maximise speed and improve service quality for a better customer experience. Lean tools become most powerful when they become deeply embedded in the mindset of the organisation. A continuously improving process not only ensures fast decision making, flexibility and increased performance, but also guarantees a competitive advantage that customers will notice. A lean finance function will ensure that customers come first – and in today’s consumer-dominated world, that often proves to be the most competitive position of all.

Total purchase orders in fiscal year
More than 50% of purchase orders were equivalent to only 3% of total € spend.